INDUSTRIAL LOGGING IMMINENT AROUND CLIO, BLAIRSDEN, PORTOLA, CROMBERG, SPRING GARDEN

Along the Gooseneck just west of Portola, CA in the “Lost Sierra” where the Forest Service is poised to send in heavy equipment to remove near 80% of the tree canopy

The forest (dis)service has informed us that INDUSTRIAL LOGGING will start as early as LATER THIS WEEK on the “opportunity” area of the so-called “community protection” wildfire-excuse “emergency” logging project (see map below).

This immediate logging plan potentially impacts the Highway 70 corridor from Spring Garden to Portola, the entire wild “Gooseneck” area along the Feather River, Blairsden and Clio. They intend to remove up to near 80% of trees in these areas, and destroy virtually every plant and shrub. We are working with our attorneys to understand the extent and location of this imminent activity. If you see logging equipment or men in your area, please reply to this message and let us know the details. Subsequent logging/ poisoning in other areas (marked in various colors on the map) is expected to start in earnest in 2026. Note that this map is limited to the “emergency areas” designated in the “Central and West Slope Community Protection Project”– additional “non emergency” areas nearby are set to be logged/ poisoned as soon as next year.

This plan is the result of an incomplete, flawed, and misleading environmental analysis.  We are suing (along with Plumas Forest Project and John Muir Project) to require the preparation of a full EIS (Environmental Impact Statement).

Gooseneck area west of Portola, CA: wild area subject to industrial devastation

If you can take personal action to defend the forest, or volunteer with us to support our efforts, we need you now, and especially heading into spring/ summer/ fall next year. The pervasive “mass delusion” that the government can control nature and prevent wildfires has infected our communities (including local media and environmental organizations)– and is putting people at risk. Help us educate the public about this horrific plan and how it is built on false wildfire myths — please spread the word: post this site on social media and share with friends.

Head out to these areas in purple on the map, and take photos. They may be unrecognizable in a matter of weeks. It’s a beautiful time in the Lost Sierra, with the leaves changing, bright sunshine, and clean air. Come for a visit!

We condemn in the strongest possible terms these plans to sterilize local forests and increase wildfire risk to communities. It is greed and betrayal of the worst kind, based on misinformation and fiddled science, threatening to destroy what we truly love about the lost sierra— the wild and our close-knit communities

Thanks for your support everyone, through these rough times, it means a lot to us! We are committed to real solutions to climate chaos and the threats posed by wildfire to rural communities in a disturbed climate

Map showing extent of “emergency” logging planned- areas marked in purple may begin as soon as late October 2025

Beyem Seyo Wolves Murdered in Botched Sierra Valley Fish and Wildlife Raid

Wolves of the Beyem Seyo pack in the Lost Sierra, 4 of whom were murdered this week by state agents.

Wolves Murdered: The Lost Sierra is tragically a little less wild this weekend. The California Department of Fish and Wildlife this week shot and killed 4 members of the Beyem Seyo wolf pack in Sierra Valley, simply for following their instincts and preying on “free hamburgers” (AKA cows and calves) left out in the valley unattended.

According to the CDFW website, ranchers and CDFW officials spent “18,000 hours” trying wolf deterrent methods, but apparently failed to implement what is widely known as the most effective wolf deterrent, the presence of Pyrenees dogs and llamas to guard the herd, combined with the old cowboy technique of “riding the range.” If ranchers claim that the herds are too big to defend, then these industrial sized herds are clearly too big-period. If wolves cannot survive even in one of California’s most wild areas, what chance do they have in the state?

Death without reason is murder and state officials and local ranchers have blood on their hands. These (endangered) wolves who included one of only a handful of breeding pairs in the whole state, were murdered unnecessarily by state officials, who failed initially to prevent habituation of the wolves to easy meals, when they knew wolves were in the area. The killings are even more unnecessary, as the cows in Sierra Valley are about to be transported to the central valley for overwintering, and they would not be a food source for much longer this season anyway.

Instead of working with the entire community to come up with a solution, the CDFW have basically become a “strike team” obediently serving Big Ag and destroying even the most sensitive and endangered species in our state. Shame on them.

According to one source, the wolves were shot from a helicopter with tranquilizer darts and then given lethal injections– simply for behaving like wolves. Another three wolves are being removed from their natural habitat and interned in a fenced preserve, according to the same source. The CDFW apparently is well on its way to removing the entire Beyem Seyo wolf pack from the landscape. These kind of unnecessary and damaging attacks on the wild are what our tax dollars are paying for.

This pyrenees female, neglected by a Portola man, thirstily drinks from water a volunteer brought her. She and her puppies could instead be defending cattle from predator attacks in the area.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

If you live in wildfire country, you have an obligation to yourself, your family, your neighbors, and firefighters to harden your home against fire and maintain defensible space. If you are a rancher who operates in wild areas, you have an obligation to defend your herd against predators of all types, even if it means more work, and to accept that running such operations in wild areas means some risk of loss.

It must be horrible and quite traumatic for the calf, the mother and the whole herd, we are not cheering the wolf kills by any means. They should be eating deer in the woods and other prey. The only way to prevent wolves killing cattle is having other animals guarding them. It’s clear that fladry etc is not sufficient. It also must be quite traumatic for ranchers to witness, especially if one is attached to the herd.  We don’t mean to minimize that, but it is nature, predators are a part of it…we can’t just erase them from the landscape. It is one more reason to adopt best practices for coexistence.

This culture has a tendency– when confronted by natural risks– to lash out against the wild rather than take responsibility for our own role in the problem. Killing wolves and cutting down forests won’t prevent predators or wildfires, it will only make these things more potent.  These dysfunctional actions have their roots in manifest destiny and the associated widespread slaughter of Native American men, women, children, and elders only a few generations ago.

The solution is not to continue killing an endangered species struggling to make a recovery, the solution is to remove the unnatural feature on the landscape (easy hamburger meals undefended by dogs, humans or llamas).

BIG AG out of Sierra Valley NOW!

Large scale ranching of cows in the Sierra Valley:

– endangers the recovery of keystone predator populations

– is a large and growing source of methane and other carbon emissions

– damages meadows– when done on former wetland areas, ranchers use heavy equipment to dig channels and disrupt the flow of water through the land, drying out meadows and losing crucial habitat as well as large quantities of carbon storage.

– pollutes waterways, specifically the headwaters of the Feather River serving the water needs of 26 million Californians

Instead of logging the forest (which makes wildfires more dangerous) we can take personal responsibility for our homes and businesses by installing ember proof vents and other home hardening measures. Destroying forests with heavy equipment is unnecessary and counterproductive.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The CDFW website states:

“The impacted wolves included a breeding pair (WHA08M and LAS23F), female (BEY01F) and male (BEY12M). During the course of the operation, a juvenile wolf (BEY12M) was mistaken for the breeding male (WHA08M), which was of similar color and size, and was unintentionally lethally removed. Remains of two additional juveniles in this pack (BEY15M and BEY17M) were found and they were determined to have died prior to the start of the operation. The cause of their deaths is unknown; however, juvenile gray wolf death due to natural causes is common.”

So, it sounds like the CDFW killed a juvenile wolf “unintentionally” and it also sounds like they are failing  to adequately investigate the deaths of the other two juvenile wolves even though this might have been associated with an illegal killing by local ranchers. So much for the rule of law.

Human supremacy is just as insidious and evil as white supremacy, and does immeasurable harm to the natural world. Both must be fought and defeated.

Lodge a complaint to your state senator and assemblymember and directly to CDFW- DEMAND they leave the remnants of the Beyem SEO pack ALONE and provide direct guidance on a guard dog/ llama program for local ranchers rather than resorting to murder: Jennifer.benedet@wildlife.ca.gov

Animal Neglect in Portola–Take Action

UPDATE OCT. 7th 1pm: We received the following update:

“Confirming that Plumas County Animal Services (PCAS) has the mom and pups.  They are all healthy and doing well.”
We suspect that the mom and pups will be transferred to High Sierra Animal Rescue and will update here if/when/where they are available for adoption. 
Thank you for everyone’s efforts in putting pressure on PCAS and the sheriff to do the right thing. This resulted in a (partial) victory for the mom and her pups. They may still be in the mud if it wasn’t for community awareness and pressure.
 
Mr. Gregory, as far as we know, still has one dog, several chickens and possibly 2 sheep. Someone who treats their animals this way should not be permitted to keep animals- period.
If you have witnessed or witness Robert Gregory abusing his animals (which we have heard he does) or abusing them in any way, immediately call the Plumas County sheriff at (530) 283-6375 and insist they take a report. 
Unfortunately Plumas County Animal Services continues to euthanize dogs, cats and other animals every year. Breeding animals just continues this cycle of suffering and death which is why we need free or affordable spay/neuter services available to everyone. Thank you to Friends of Plumas County Animals who organize a community cat “spayathon” twice a year to prevent uncontrolled breeding (partially funded by the county). Spay/neuter vouchers for pet dogs and cats can be obtained from PCAS or local rescues. With more efforts like this, we can hopefully join counties whose shelters have become no-kill. Always “adopt, don’t shop” when adding an animal companion to your family so that animals are not euthanized at shelters.
You can write to the board of supervisors, thank them for supporting the community cat spayathon, and ask them to do whatever it takes to become a “no kill” county. Tell them that animal welfare is important to you and your community. Send comments to:  pcbs@countyofplumas.com

 

UPDATE OCT. 1ST 11:30AM:  We continue to be stonewalled with regard to the status of the Robert Gregory case. Alex Saez, the ACO, continues to refuse to provide any details.

It appears that Plumas County Animal Control (part of whose mission statement is to dispose of unwanted stray animals..”)  considers acceptable these conditions and Mr. Gregory’s threats to kill his dog and “replace her” when he doesn’t want to pay for routine vet care. The County is allowing this animal abuser to keep his animals, even though multiple foster homes and rescues have come forward to take in the animals. This is not acceptable.

Plumas County, under current leadership, puts “animal ownership” above  all else including enforcing the laws on animal cruelty and neglect, and preventing suffering.

You can help by:

–donating money for outreach/ legal action

— speaking up at Board of Supervisors meetings

please contact us  if you can help in these ways. Thank you, FRA!


UPDATE  SEPT. 29TH 3:45PM: We received the following response from Plumas County Animal Control:

It’s an open case and being handled.

Thank you,

PCAC Staff

201 N Mill Creek Rd

Quincy, CA 95971

530-283-3673

Feel free to call them and ask them for more details, about how they are following the law….by leaving puppies in the dirt and with a man who leaves animals without food or water and on a chain, and shoots them when they no longer serve his purposes…this is a truly sick County if people think this is OK.

UPDATE SEPT. 28TH 2:30pm:  As far as we know the animals are all still at the location. Animal Control say they have “successfully been in contact with the owner of the animals and will be working towards a solution.”  Unfortunately any solution that allows this man to continue to own animals is not a solution. Foster carers are badly and immediately needed for the dog mom and 9 puppies. Please contact us for more details.

UPDATE SEPT. 27TH 3PM:  We are told by Plumas Sheriff that this is an active investigation, that the ACO visited last night and took photos, but no action has been taken yet.

UPDATE SEPT. 27TH 2PM: The animals at the Idle Hour property remain on their own, and we understand the county is deferring to the ‘owner’ who remains out of town and plans to meet him out there tomorrow (sunday). The mother dog now has access to water, but the rear ends of the mother dog as well as the sheep are absolutely filthy, at immediate risk of fly strike, and they all need to get out of this intolerable situation ASAP. Please call the sheriff at (530) 283-6375 even if you already have and demand the animals are taken TODAY.


A Portola resident named Robert Gregory has a history of abusing and neglecting animals. We suspect that he shot and killed one of his dogs rather than get her routine eye surgery, saying it was cheaper to replace her. When we confronted him about it, he did not deny it. But without any direct evidence, we couldn’t do anything. He has since told another person that the dog was “stolen.” Violence against animals leads to violence against people. Exhibit A: Kristi Noem, Dept. of Homeland (In)security.

Yesterday, a visitor to his property on Idle Hour Dr. discovered a number of animals on his land without food or water. His Great Pyrenees dog was found chained up, unable to reach her water dish, and having just given birth to 9 puppies, which are nesting in the dirt. Mr. Gregory did not even know his dog was pregnant. She has hip dysplasia and needs medical treatment. There is also feces and blood on her from giving birth, and she cannot clean herself off. The puppies need to be in a warm and sanitary environment, as parvo lives in the soil and they will suffer and die if not immediately confiscated by the county. There is another dog there without proper food or water access and several sheep and chickens, also neglected. Some kind neighbors have since fed and watered the animals, but they are still on their own and the dogs are still chained with no supervision.

There is no running water on the property, and no human in residence. Mr. Gregory visits intermittently and has to carry in water by foot. In addition to being neglectful and abusive to animals, he is having health and financial issues and simply is not in a position to care for these animals.

We called Plumas County Animal Services, and spoke with ACO Alex Saez, who did not take the matter seriously, leaving them to fend for themselves for the night. He says he is going out there today to meet with the owner, Robert Gregory, to “counsel” him. We told Alex that there is no counseling this man (we’ve tried), that the animals need to be confiscated and brought to safety immediately. We also called the sheriff which oversees animal control and demanded the same thing. They say they will go out there this evening to talk with Mr. Gregory. The county seems to think it is acceptable to let newborn puppies writhe in the dirt for days while they wait for a good time for the owner to meet with them.

These animals don’t need talk, they need swift action. Please help us and put pressure on the sheriff to immediately bring these animals to safety.

ACO Alex Saez has a history of gaslighting and giving misinformation to people who call animal services requesting help or reporting neglect. When we have reported other cases of abuse he acts annoyed and dismissive. When people call asking for help with feral cats, instead of referring them to existing (free) spay/neuter resources available, he has told people to “stop feeding them” (which is not in any way a solution) and we were told by one person that he told them to hire an exterminator, which is both inhumane and illegal.

TAKE ACTION: Please call or email BOTH the Plumas County Sheriff’s Office and Plumas County Board of Supervisors and demand that Mr. Gregory’s animals be immediately confiscated and brought to safety. Demand that Mr. Gregory be prohibited from owning animals. Also demand that Alex Saez be removed from his position as he does not care for animals or for the community. 

Plumas County Sheriff: CrystalGordy@countyofplumas.com   (530) 283-6375
Plumas County Board of Supervisors: pcbs@countyofplumas.com   (530) 283-6170

How we treat animals and our environment is inextricably linked, and neither are faring well at the moment. We must stand up for what is right.

Thank you for taking action today.

Feather River Action!