Feather River Action! Tours Area of Old Growth Forest Threatened by USFS “Community Destruction Plan”

On Nov. 12th, FRA! led a public tour of areas threatened by the US Forest Service “Community Destruction” Logging Project. Much of this is truly old growth forest (that Biden claims to be protecting). However, by the time his protection order goes into effect (in 2025, depending on elections), much old growth and mature forest will already be gone or destroyed under emergency orders from Biden’s  own Agriculture Dept. We demand a halt to extreme logging plans in the Feather River watershed, as these plans will only exacerbate the harm the Forest Service claims to want to prevent.

If the Strawberry Valley area were in any other country in the world, it would be a national park, preserved for all time as a pride and treasure. But in the US, it is (apparently) considered an expendable area for the biomass and timber industries. This is an incredibly unique Sierra rainforest ecosystem that must be protected. When we visited this fall, there were fungi everywhere, strawberry plants covering the ground, and large banana-like slugs crossing the road. A rare, coastal-like forest in the middle of the Sierras.

Take a drive up La Porte Rd. in Plumas County and see for yourself what a unique, rainforest environment this is. The area feels like a different world than the sierra mixed conifer and eastside pine forests common to the area. Strawberry Valley gets over 80 inches of liquid precipitation every year, and this contributes to faster tree growth (and thus carbon sequestration– and unfortunately attention from the timber industry).

The right turn to Strawberry Valley campground (just past North Star) is paved but unmarked, and though the campground is closed for the season, you can park along the road and walk among the giant trees. The area is beautiful (and at risk!) and well worth a visit.

On our way back from Strawberry Valley, we witnessed industrial devastation of the forest along La Porte Rd. near Pilot Lake (apparently in the name of “forest management”). Soil was compacted and damaged, virtually all life was torn apart.

This is apparently what the US Forest Service wants to do to more than a quarter million more acres in Plumas and neighboring counties, in the name of “wildfire protection.”

Far from protecting communities, this kind of disturbance leads to flammable slash piles, thickets of small flammable trees and faster, wind driven wildfires through dried out forests. It’s too bad so many people have drank the Kool Aid and think this kind of destruction is okay (even some environmental groups!). It’s not JUST about fuels, it is also very much about aridity and wind speed which this kind of clear cut “thinning” is very good at increasing.

No industrial logging on public lands!!

Protect our communities, climate and forests!!

The sign right next to the devastated area states that “it is unlawful to excavate, remove, disturb, deface or destroy…(any object)”

Unfortunately no one read the sign before unleashing industrial equipment upon the public forest. According to the sign, “violators are subject to arrest.”

We have requested more information from the Forest Service about this vandalism and the perpetrators responsible and will post it here if and when we hear back.

Due to Climate Emergency, Essential US Forest Service Management Activities to be Carried out Monday

MEDIA ALERT: Climate and Fire Safety-Risking 275,000+ Acre “Community Destruction Project”—  Largest Ever Logging Plan in Plumas National Forest Generating Increasing Resistance; Intervention Planned at US Forest Service Office in Quincy, CA Monday Morning
 
Media Contact (Plumas County/ California): Josh Hart, Spokesperson Feather River Action!
 

QUINCY, CA—The U.S. Forest Service’s $650 Million “Community Protection Project,” the most extreme logging plan in Plumas National Forest history, has been presented as a response to the climate-driven Dixie Fire, yet would emit 6 million tons of CO2 and spray $30 million of herbicides to convert wild forest habitat to tree plantations that are more fire prone.

The fact that not one cent of the $650m of taxpayer money would pay for structure hardening, evacuation planning, or defensible space around structures has riled a growing number of local residents who say the plan is  waste of public money and would only put communities at greater risk from faster moving wildfires in the future by causing greater evaporation and wind speeds through the damaged forest canopy.

The plan is one of the first logging projects (in CA, NV, and ID) under a new federal “emergency action” loophole that allows cutting of National Forests without customary legal challenges by claiming extreme wildfire threat. 

The Plumas National Forest Central and West Slope Project involves logging and $30 million of herbicide spraying over 275,000 acres of the Plumas National Forest in the Beckwourth, Feather River, and Mt. Hough Ranger Districts in Plumas, Yuba, and Butte and Sierra Counties. Despite recent high intensity fires being linked to the climate crisis, the Forest Service is planning to add to the problem by doubling down on logging and fire suppression that have caused the current crisis. The USFS estimates nearly 6 million tons of carbon dioxide would be released over a ten year period
 [1], yet claim without evidence that “these emissions would likely be offset.”

In January, Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack invoked a controversial “emergency action” authorization, as laid out under Section 40807 of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act of 2021, targeting up to 45 million acres of National Forests across the western U.S. [4] This so-called emergency logging “shall not be subject to objection under the predecisional administrative review process,” a legal challenge used by environmental advocates to pause or stop destructive projects. [5]

This unprecedented scale of logging is inconsistent with President Biden’s executive order to protect old growth forests. It would release an estimated 4 gigatons of carbon dioxide (90 tons of CO2 released per acre), the equivalent of 635 coal plants and greater than the entire U.S. emissions goal of 3.3 gigatons for 2030. [6]

According to Josh Schlossberg of the Eco-Integrity Alliance, one of the groups opposed to the plan, “Despite one-sided and often inaccurate media coverage, industry/agency claims of ‘overgrown’ forests, ‘unusual’ high-severity wildfire, and the efficacy of ‘wildfire risk reduction’ logging have been debunked by countless studies in peer-reviewed journals from independent scientists.”


Indeed, these studies (not funded by agencies with conflicts of interest proven to intentionally exclude scientific data) conclude that western forests prior to fire suppression did grow densely, did experience high-severity wildfire, and that not only won’t logging stop large wildfires, it can make them burn hotter and spread faster by opening forests to sunlight and wind. [7][8]

Yet, contrary to this science, “wildfire risk reduction” logging—which includes clearcutting mature and old-growth trees—is being justified as an “emergency” to supposedly address “threats to natural resources” and “hazards threatening human health and safety. The scientific consensus is that hardening homes—measures such as installing metal roofs and maintaining defensible space up to 100 feet around structures—are the only thing that actually prevents structure losses in a wildfire. Research has shown that nothing done beyond 100 feet makes any difference to the survivability of homes. [9]

“The central cause of recent high intensity wildfires is the worsening climate crisis [10], caused by deforestation, which the Forest Service now wants to ramp up,” says Josh Hart with Portola, CA-based 
Feather River Action!. “Their plan would devastate biodiversity, increase carbon emissions, damage crucial carbon sinks, and turn forests into dried out tree plantations, making extreme wildfires like the Dixie more—not less threatening to communities. We demand the USFS halt this dangerous and destructive project immediately.
 

Event details: Monday November 13th 8:30am, US Forest Service HQ 159 Lawrence St. Quincy CA Visuals include local residents holding signs, ‘carrying out necessary safety and health-related “Forest Service management,” bullhorns and plenty of local forest policy controversy..

[1] https://www.fs.usda.gov/project/plumas/?project=62873
[2] https://www.fs.usda.gov/project/?project=61355
[3] https://usfs-public.app.box.com/v/PinyonPublic/file/1201186672813
[4]
https://www.congress.gov/118/meeting/house/115437/witnesses/HHRG-118-AP06-Wstate-MooreR-20230323.pdf
[5] https://www.congress.gov/117/plaws/publ58/PLAW-117publ58.pdf
[6] https://irp.cdn-website.com/0358d1eb/files/uploaded/Version-2.0-JMP-ReportRFS.pdf
[7] https://www.mdpi.com/2571-6255/6/4/146
[8] https://botanicgardens.uw.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/7/2022/03/Prichard_etal_2021_10CommonQuestions.pdf

Josh Hart
Spokesperson
Feather River Action!